"Acting is the ability to live truthfully under imaginary circumstances." -- Sanford Meisner


.

.
30 SEP 2017, 7PM @ Hall 1, GV Grand 1 Kim Seng Promenade #03-29 Great World City Tickets by Invitation only.

Search This Blog


31 Aug - 3 Sep 2017

Art House, Old Parliament, Singapore.


Enter Your Email to Follow:

Friday, May 24, 2013

Film Review: The Great Gatsby



There has been some criticisms about the movie not doing justice to the book "The Great Gatsby", which culminated locally in Singapore's Straits Times Life Section article on the 20th May 2013. And so I gave my two cents worth and it got published! :)

Here is what the actors say:








Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Cathay Motion Picture Awards 2013: Refuge













Hour 0-2:
I was on my way home when I got a phone call from Mark Song about acting in "Refuge" as an entry for the Cathay Motion Picture Awards 2013, 78 hour competition to produce a 78 second film surrounding the theme of "Tomorrow". I have not met Mark or any of the team members before, so I took a U-turn to meet them.

Hour 3:
The team: Mark, Eddy, Daniel and Lydia, were seated around a table at Starbucks discussing the script when I arrived. They had just came out of Cathay's briefing and the clock had started ticking.

Then, we were still busy arguing about the script and calling friends to fill the daughter role. Daniel, the director, fills the role of the robber, I fill the father role and finally Aki came on board as the daughter. This, after many rejections and disappointments at the eleventh hour.

With the cast out of the way, it was down to pestering a friend to lend us a punching bag and agreeing on the location. We agreed to use my condominium gym and the park nearby, for the peace, quiet and convenience.
Hour 7:
I left the crew after dinner, while they sorted the story board, camera shots and call times for tomorrow.



Here is the film proper:




Originally, the father was to defend her daughter against her abusive boyfriend that motivated him to train hard to protect her better in the future. We felt that this conveys the unintended message of revenge and so we replaced the 'boy friend' with a random robber.

Hour 22 to 30:
We met up for breakfast at 10am by the condo pool after lugging the hefty punching bag up the stairs. Shooting started subsequently in a park down the road.















The difficult part in the park were the camera positions and angles, and the actors' movements since there was an action sequence. We repeated it till we got the correct frames without clutter in the background and without my falling onto a tree or seriously injured by stray punches. The ambient light was reasonable. It was not too harsh, neither was it cloudy. There were very few people in the park, if at all, so we didn't need to do any crowd control.















The difficulty in the gym was that we didn't have a ceiling hook to hang the punching bag, and so we sat it on a plastic chair.
















Funny enough, it was the noise of the plastic chair rocking away that enhanced that aggressive sound of punches. Some serendipity. The gym is also small and that is one reason you find many close-up shots.





Unfortunately, the make-up artist couldn't make it, so we relied on Aki and what Daniel rapidly learned from Youtube the night before.


Daniel proceeded to return the punching bag to his friend, while Aki and I went upstairs to chill and have a glass of ginger wine! :)

Hour 30-33
Straight after production, Mark and Eddy proceeded to the reading room to edit, while Lydia worked in tandem with the boys to compose the soundtrack.

Hour 34:
The first rough cut is done and we went for dinner before going home at 10pm. We still needed the refinements, a written narrative and a sound track. 




















Some other robber you may meet in future.

Hour 45-72:
After a good night's sleep  the crew continued their work in the morning and completed the film in the 72th hour.

In short, we scripted, casted, got the props, acted, shot, edited and composed the sound track, to produce a 78 second film about "Tomorrow", in 72 hours.


This is the first time I have participated in such a competition. The short deadline forced us to be focused and resourceful. The 78 hour deadline isn't the menacing part, but the 78 second screen time definitely is. It is a challenge to tell a story that is interesting, not straight-in-the-face and yet meaningful within the time frame. And also without long voice-over narratives and explicit dialogues, since films are essentially visual and human beings are notoriously known for making conflicting decisions upon vague desires. Such contradictions keep life interesting and perhaps is the impetus to tell stories that entertain and inspire. :)



Watch out for our voting link to help us win!